🚨 QUEEN’S REVENGE: FORMER MISS UNIVERSE DIRECTOR BREAKS SILENCE ON ‘FLAGRANT FRAUD’ IN THAILAND—SHOCKING NEW TRUTH ABOUT AHTISA MANALO! 💥

The Miss Universe 2025 stage has been officially branded a crime scene, not by sensationalist media, but by the scathing testimony of a pageant insider. The world is reeling from the post-pageant allegations of a rigged outcome, but now, the full, crushing weight of the scandal has been confirmed by a powerful voice: former Miss Universe Philippines National Director, Shamsey Supsup.

Supsup, who personally witnessed the finals in Thailand, has stepped forward with an explosive, unvarnished declaration that the result was nothing short of “flagrant fraud.” Her statement cuts through the carefully constructed corporate denial, lending undeniable credibility to the widespread public outcry and the earlier, shocking revelations of a “cooking show.”

THE TRAVESTY OF THE CROWN: WHO REALLY WON?

Shamsey Supsup’s analysis is not just a critique; it’s an itemized indictment of the final ranking. She shattered the official results, claiming the entire final outcome was a deliberate misrepresentation of the deserving queens.

Her damning pronouncements redraw the final scoreboard, revealing the true order that was allegedly suppressed:

Miss Mexico (The crowned winner) should have been relegated to Fourth Runner-Up.

Miss Côte d’Ivoire (who was eliminated early or placed low) was the True Winner of Miss Universe 2025.

Ahtisa Manalo (Miss Philippines, who placed 3rd Runner-Up) was unjustly denied the First Runner-Up spot, or even the Crown itself.

This stunning, authoritative re-ranking confirms the deepest fears of pageant analysts globally: the selection process was allegedly compromised to an unprecedented degree. According to Supsup, the event was less “Miss Universe” and more “Miss Underverse”—a darkly coded term suggesting manipulation and deceit that ran deeper than anyone initially suspected. The emotional intensity of her statement—a veteran director speaking out against the organization she once served—is a devastating blow to the integrity of the MU brand.

NAWAT’S MYSTERY: THE COLLABORATION AND THE COMPLIMENT

Adding a layer of perplexing mystery to the drama is the involvement of Nawat Itsaragrisil, the influential figure behind the rival Miss Grand International (MGI) pageant. Nawat, known for his outspoken critiques and business acumen, made a crucial public statement that, while seemingly complimentary, held an underlying tone of knowledge and veiled warning.

When asked about the turmoil, Nawat conspicuously focused his praise on Ahtisa Manalo, commending her “very good attitude.”

Nawat’s Coded Praise: “Congratulations for Philippines, always strong, always Top 5. And she’s very good and she has a very good attitude. I spoke to her, ‘I like your organization. I am happy for the run-up.’ I understand everything and smile, and yeah, she’s very nice, she’s very humble.”

Nawat’s use of the phrases “I understand everything” and his emphasis on Ahtisa’s composure hints at a shared, unspoken acknowledgment of the alleged fraud. His compliment to Ahtisa reads less like praise for her performance and more like support for her forced silence—a subtle nod to the fact that he knows the truth, and she is handling an impossible, unfair situation with grace.

Furthermore, Nawat hinted at ongoing, high-level discussions about collaboration, possibly with the Miss Universe franchise in Puerto Rico. His playful evasiveness—*“I don’t know if I go there for working or for support Miss Universe”—*underscores the powerful shift in the pageant landscape. As MU grapples with the fallout from the alleged cooking show, rival organizations and directors are positioning themselves to capitalize on the ensuing chaos.

AHTISA’S SILENT WOUNDS: THE WEIGHT OF COMPLIANCE

Shamsey Supsup’s insider exposé validates the theory that Ahtisa Manalo was a victim of geopolitical sabotage. Her third runner-up placement, which Supsup argues should have been the crown or the first runner-up spot, means she was robbed of a title despite her superior merit.

The image of Ahtisa, praised by Nawat for accepting the injustice with a “smile” and professing happiness for her runner-up placement, is now unbearably poignant. She was forced into an act of professional compliance, her true feelings of anguish and betrayal hidden beneath a layer of pageant polish.

Nawat himself admitted the depth of her pain: “We should support her feeling, her mood, because I believe that she will hope for the winner but she must be so upset or sad, so I would like to support. This is done, we cannot do anything, you do your best…”

This is the ultimate investigation: penetrating the facade of celebrity to find the raw, human cost of corruption. Ahtisa, the beautiful, humble queen, had to endure the soul-crushing realization that her years of hard work were destroyed by a backroom deal. Her “very good attitude” was, in reality, a masterclass in emotional containment while her dream was publicly desecrated.

The revelation by a former National Director of Supsup’s stature is the final, definitive piece of evidence. It transforms the public’s frustration into a justifiable cause for rebellion. The question is no longer whether the pageant was fixed, but what action will be taken now that the world has witnessed the blatant betrayal of its most deserving queen. The integrity of the crown has been shattered, and only a full, transparent reckoning can restore honor to the title and justice to Ahtisa Manalo. The reign of silence is over, and the era of accountability has begun.