That statement, issued by authorities amid mounting public pressure, has intensified the already explosive controversy surrounding the sudden death of former Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) Undersecretary Maria Catalina Cabral.
What initially appeared to be a tragic incident has rapidly evolved into a high-stakes national mystery, layered with unanswered questions, institutional failures, and the shadow of long-standing corruption allegations tied to massive government infrastructure projects. This is no longer just about how one woman died—it is about what she knew, what she may have been about to reveal, and whether her death conveniently silenced a crucial voice.
A deliberate stop—and a disappearance

According to official reports, Undersecretary Cabral traveled to Camp 5 along Canon Road, where she personally instructed her driver to drop her off. This was not a spontaneous act, nor did it raise immediate alarm. Witnesses noted that she stepped out of the vehicle calmly, as if she were about to inspect something in the area.
Her driver later stated that this behavior was not unusual. Cabral was known for personally inspecting project sites, often without hesitation or fear. Trusting her judgment, the driver left the area, expecting to meet her again later that afternoon at their hotel.
But when 5:00 p.m. arrived, Cabral never showed up.
Concern quickly turned into fear. After waiting and attempting to locate her, the driver finally reported her missing to authorities. Just hours later, at around 8:00 p.m., responders discovered a body at the bottom of a ravine, estimated to be 20 to 23 meters deep, in the same area where Cabral had been dropped off.
She was unresponsive. Though rushed to a hospital, she was declared dead on arrival.
Accident—or something far darker?
Almost immediately, speculation erupted. Was it a tragic accident? A misstep in low visibility? Or was there external involvement?
Authorities were quick to caution against premature conclusions. Initial assessments reportedly showed no clear signs of foul play, but officials emphasized that the case remains far from closed.
Justice Secretary Jesus Crispin Remulla confirmed that a full autopsy is underway, along with a DNA test to conclusively establish the identity of the remains. While the family has already identified the body as Cabral’s, Remulla stressed that family recognition alone is not sufficient in a case of this magnitude.
“Scientific confirmation is necessary,” he said, “especially when there is even the slightest possibility of deception, misidentification, or manipulation.”
Why a DNA test—despite family confirmation?

The decision to mandate DNA testing raised eyebrows and fueled online speculation. Critics asked: why insist on further verification when the family has already confirmed her identity?
According to the Justice Secretary, the answer lies in hard-earned caution. There have been cases in the past, he explained, where death was used—real or staged—as a means to evade accountability.
“Painful as it may be for the family,” Remulla stated, “we must ensure that there is absolutely no room for doubt.”
The implication was chilling: nothing can be assumed, and every possibility—however uncomfortable—must be examined.
A crime scene mishandled?
Authorities also acknowledged procedural lapses in the early handling of the scene. Ideally, the location where Cabral’s body was found should have been treated as an active crime scene, with extensive documentation and forensic examination before the remains were released.
Instead, the body was turned over quickly, limiting investigators’ ability to gather potential evidence. Officials have admitted these shortcomings and are now attempting to recover what they can through secondary means, including forensic analysis and digital evidence.
Phones, laptops, and the race for digital truth
Investigators have formally requested access to Cabral’s cellphone, computers, and personal devices, which are currently in the possession of her family. Authorities clarified that these items will only be obtained through proper legal channels, including subpoenas, to preserve the chain of custody and ensure admissibility in court.
Officials insist that the devices are not automatically considered compromised, and forensic experts may still recover crucial data—messages, call logs, location history—that could shed light on Cabral’s final hours.
“You may not read a person’s mind,” one official remarked, “but their digital footprint often tells a story they never had the chance to speak out loud.”
Corruption cases will not die with her
Perhaps the most politically explosive aspect of this case lies beyond the manner of Cabral’s death. Authorities made it clear: her passing does not end the investigation into alleged corruption within DPWH, particularly involving controversial flood control projects.
Cabral was believed to possess critical knowledge regarding financial anomalies tied to public infrastructure spending. Her death, officials admitted, represents a significant loss to the investigation—but not a reason to halt it.
The Department of Justice and the Office of the Ombudsman are continuing to trace money flows, assets, and properties, pursuing civil forfeiture where warranted. Even if a key figure is gone, accountability, they insist, remains very much alive.
Witnesses under protection, more arrests expected
To prevent further loss or intimidation, key witnesses connected to the broader case have reportedly been placed under DOJ protective custody. The goal is clear: encourage cooperation and prevent fear from burying the truth.
Authorities have also confirmed that recent arrests linked to the larger investigation are only the beginning. More names may surface in the coming days or weeks.
A question that refuses to go away
As the investigation deepens, one thing becomes increasingly clear: this case is far bigger than a single death. With over 42,000 DPWH projects nationwide, and only flood control initiatives currently under scrutiny, the scope of what remains hidden is vast.
Was Cabral’s death a tragic accident—or the final chapter in a story someone wanted erased?
For now, the government promises transparency. The public, however, remains watchful—and skeptical.
And the question lingers, louder by the day:
Will the full truth come out, and will everyone responsible—no matter how powerful—finally be held to account?